Zambia Act or statute

Zambia legislation

Evidence Act, 1973

This section gives the Act its short title: the Evidence Act. This section defines several terms used in the Act. In civil proceedings, the court may admit certain documentary statements as evidence if the section’s…

admissibility of evidenceattestationcourt evidence assessmentcourt proceduredefinitionsdocumentary evidencelitigationlitigation processproof of documentsrecordsrecords managementstatutory interpretationwitness evidence

Publicly available, excluded from search-engine indexing

This page remains available for direct research for the following reasons:

  • The record does not meet this release's canonical indexing criteria. (market-indexing-disabled)
  • The record does not meet this release's canonical indexing criteria. (emergency-noindex)

Professional statute overview

Enactment structure, operative effect and source provenance

Official source

01

Purpose and legislative effect

“This section gives the Act its short title: the Evidence Act.”

This section gives the Act its short title: the Evidence Act. This section defines several terms used in the Act. In civil proceedings, the court may admit certain documentary statements as evidence if the section’s conditions are met, and it has discretion to allow copies or admit evidence even when the maker is not called as a witness. In criminal proceedings, certain statements in trade, business, or professional records can be admitted as evidence if the document and source-person conditions are met. When deciding how much weight to give admissible evidence, the decision-maker must consider all circumstances affecting accuracy, including whether the information was recorded contemporaneously and whether anyone involved had an incentive to conceal or misrepresent facts.

02

How the instrument operates

  1. 01

    Start with the recorded version

    Source version 31 Dec 1996. The date shown identifies this source expression and should not be treated as proof that no later change exists.

  2. 02

    Locate the controlling provision

    Use the provision map, part headings and full-text filter to move from the broad subject to the exact legal language.

  3. 03

    Read conditions and exceptions together

    Keep subsections, definitions, provisos and cross-references in context before drawing a legal conclusion.

  4. 04

    Verify currency and official wording

    Confirm later legislation, commencement notices and corrections with the official publisher before advice, filing or reliance.

03

Research entry points

Selected provisions across the instrument. Open any row to continue with the exact stored text.

04

Source and current-law status

Source record view

Source record from zambialii.org · Source version 31 Dec 1996

Verify current force

The source record does not state a definitive current-law status. Check the official publisher and later amendments before relying on this text.

Source-indexed provision map

Sections and provisions

Search by section, heading, part or exact legal wording. Every result remains linked to the stored source record.

Showing 9 of 9 provisions

Provision 5Amendment 2Short titleCommencement
§ 1Short title ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1Short title

This section gives the Act its short title: the Evidence Act.

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Evidence Act.
§ 2Interpretation .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1Amendment

This section defines several terms used in the Act.

2. Interpretation In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires— "business" includes any public transport, public utility or similar undertaking carried on by a local authority and the activities of the General Post Office; "document" includes any device by means of which information is recorded or stored, and books, maps, plans and drawings; "proceedings" includes arbitration and references, and "court" shall be construed accordingly; "statement" includes any representation of fact, whether made in words or otherwise. [As amended by No. 3 of 1968]
§ 3Admissibility of documentary evidence as to facts in issue ........................................................................................................... 1Provision

In civil proceedings, the court may admit certain documentary statements as evidence if the section’s conditions are met, and it has discretion to allow copies or admit evidence even when the maker is not called as a witness.

3. Admissibility of documentary evidence as to facts in issue (1) In any civil proceedings where direct oral evidence of a fact would be admissible, any statement made by a person in a document and tending to establish that fact shall, on production of the original document, be admissible as evidence of that fact if the following conditions are satisfied, that is to say: (a) if the maker of the statement either— (i) had personal knowledge of the matters dealt with by the statement; or (ii) where the document in question is or forms part of a record purporting to be a continuous record, made the statement (in so far as the matters dealt with thereby are not within his personal knowledge) in the performance of a duty to record information supplied to him by a person who had, or might reasonably be supposed to have, personal knowledge of those matters; and (b) if the maker of the statement is called as a witness in the proceedings: Provided that the condition that the maker of the statement shall be called as a witness need not be satisfied if he is dead, or unfit by reason of his bodily or mental condition to attend as a witness, or if he is outside Zambia and it is not reasonably practicable to secure his attendance, or if all reasonable efforts to find him have been made without success. By Laws.Africa and contributors. Licensed under CC-BY. Share widely and freely. 1 Evidence Act, 1973 (Chapter 43) Zambia (2) In any civil proceedings, the court may, at any stage of the proceedings, if having regard to all the circumstances of the case it is satisfied that undue delay or expense would otherwise be caused, order that such a statement as is mentioned in subsection (1) shall be admissible as evidence or may, without any such order having been made, admit such a statement in evidence— (a) notwithstanding that the maker of the statement is available but is not called as a witness; (b) notwithstanding that the original document is not produced, if in lieu thereof there is produced a copy of the original document or of the material part thereof certified to be a true copy in such manner as may be specified in the order or as the court may approve, as the case may be. (3) For the purposes of this section, a statement in a document shall not be deemed to have been made by a person unless the document or the material part thereof was written, made or produced by him with his own hand, or was signed or initialed by him or otherwise recognised by him in writing as one for the accuracy of which he is responsible. (4) For the purposes of deciding whether or not a statement is admissible as evidence by virtue of the foregoing provisions, the court may draw any reasonable inference from the form or contents of the documents in which the statement is contained, or from any other circumstances, and may, in deciding whether or not a person is fit to attend as a witness, act on a certificate purporting to be the certificate of a medical practitioner, and, where the proceedings are with the aid of assessors, the court may in its discretion reject the statement notwithstanding that the requirements of this section are satisfied with respect thereto, if for any reason it appears to it to be inexpedient in the interests of justice that the statement should be admitted.
§ 4Admissibility of certain trade or business or professional records in criminal proceedings ................................................ 2Provision

In criminal proceedings, certain statements in trade, business, or professional records can be admitted as evidence if the document and source-person conditions are met.

4. Admissibility of certain trade or business or professional records in criminal proceedings (1) In any criminal proceedings where direct oral evidence of a fact would be admissible, any statement contained in a document and tending to establish that fact shall, on production of the document, be admissible as evidence of that fact if— (a) (b) the document is, or forms part of, a record relating to any trade or business or profession and compiled, in the course of that trade or business or profession, from information supplied (whether directly or indirectly) by persons who have, or may reasonably be supposed to have, personal knowledge of the matters dealt with in the information they supply; and the person who supplied the information recorded in the statement in question is dead, or outside of Zambia, or unfit by reason of his bodily or mental condition to attend as a witness, or cannot with reasonable diligence be identified or found, or cannot reasonably be expected (having regard to the time which has elapsed since he supplied the information and to all the circumstances) to have any recollection of the matters dealt with in the information he supplied. (2) For the purpose of deciding whether or not a statement is admissible as evidence by virtue of this section, the court may draw any reasonable inference from the form or content of the document in which the statement is contained, and may, in deciding whether or not a person is fit to attend as a witness, act on a certificate purporting to be a certificate of a fully registered medical practitioner. [No. 3 of 1968]
§ 5Weight to be attached to evidence .......................................................................................................................................................... 2Amendment

When deciding how much weight to give admissible evidence, the decision-maker must consider all circumstances affecting accuracy, including whether the information was recorded contemporaneously and whether anyone involved had an incentive to conceal or misrepresent facts.

5. Weight to be attached to evidence (1) In estimating the weight, if any, to be attached to a statement admissible as evidence by virtue of this Act, regard shall be had to all the circumstances from which any inference can reasonably be drawn as to the accuracy or otherwise of the statement, and in particular to the question whether or not the person who supplied the information contained or recorded in the statement did so contemporaneously with the occurrence or existence of the facts stated, and to the question By Laws.Africa and contributors. Licensed under CC-BY. Share widely and freely. 2 Evidence Act, 1973 (Chapter 43) Zambia whether or not that person, or any person concerned with making or keeping the record containing the statement, had any incentive to conceal or misrepresent the facts. (2) For the purpose of any rule of law or practice requiring evidence to be corroborated or regulating the manner in which uncorroborated evidence is to be treated, a statement rendered admissible as evidence by this Act shall not be treated as corroboration of evidence given by the maker of the statement. [As amended by No. 3 of 1968]
§ 6Proof of instrument to validity of which attestation is necessary ................................................................................................ 3Provision

In proceedings, an instrument requiring attestation may be proved without calling an attesting witness, but this section does not apply to wills or other testamentary documents.

6. Proof of instrument to validity of which attestation is necessary Subject as hereinafter provided, in any proceedings, whether civil or criminal, an instrument to the validity of which attestation is requisite may, instead of being proved by an attesting witness, be proved in the manner in which it might be proved if no attesting witness were alive: Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to the proof of wills or other testamentary documents.
§ 7Presumptions as to documents twenty years old ............................................................................................................................... 3Commencement

In civil or criminal proceedings, a document proved or appearing to be at least 20 years old gets the presumptions that applied to similarly old documents before this Act started.

7. Presumptions as to documents twenty years old In any proceedings, whether civil or criminal, there shall, in the case of a document proved, or purporting, to be not less than twenty years old, be made any presumption which immediately before the commencement of this Act would have been made in the case of a document of like character proved, or purporting, to be not less than thirty years old.
§ 8Rules of court ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3Provision

This section says court rules may allow facts to be proved by affidavit at trial, even if the deponent is not present for cross-examination.

8. Rules of court It is hereby declared that section forty-four of the High Court Act and section fifty-seven of the Subordinate Courts Act authorise the making of rules of court providing for orders being made at any stage of any proceedings directing that specified facts may be proved at the trial by affidavit with or without the attendance of the deponent for cross-examination, notwithstanding that a party desires his attendance for cross-examination and that he can be produced for that purpose. [Cap. 27; Cap. 28]
§ 9Savings ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3Provision

This section says the Act does not reduce the admissibility of evidence that would otherwise be admissible, and it does not allow documentary evidence for a pedigree declaration if that declaration would have been inadmissible before the Act.

9. Savings Nothing in this Act shall— (a) prejudice the admissibility of any evidence which would apart from the provisions of this Act be admissible; or (b) enable documentary evidence to be given to any declaration relating to a matter of pedigree, if that declaration would not have been admissible as evidence if this Act had not been passed. By Laws.Africa and contributors. Licensed under CC-BY. Share widely and freely. 3

Legislative relationships

1 referenced instrument

Names are derived from the stored provision headings and citation-enrichment layer. Treat this as a research index and verify each relationship against the source text.

G–M

1 instrument

  • High Court Act

    Section 8

Recorded versions and source checkpoint

1 version available in this collection

Current-law checkpoint
  • 31 Dec 1996 · currentEnglish

Source-linked research

Ask AI about this statute

The overview, provisions, and source records above are public. Continue in a separate conversation with this statute’s jurisdiction and source version attached.

About this LexChat collection

Statute information is organised from identified legislative sources for professional research. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.