AREsp 2153645 - DECISAO

DECISÃO Trata-se de agravo interno interposto pela União contra decisão monocrática proferida pelo Ministro Mauro Campbell Marques, assim ementada (e-STJ, fl. 1.440): PROCESSUAL CIVIL. AGRAVO EM RECURSO ESPECIAL. SERVIDOR PÚBLICO. OFENSA AO ART. 1.022 DO CPC. NÃO CONFIGURAÇÃO. AÇÃO RESCISÓRIA. VIOLAÇÃO A LITERAL...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: União
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 20 October 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Interno No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Juízo De Retratação / Reexame Do Recurso Especial
Legal Topics: Ação Rescisória, Súmula 343/stf, Incorporação De Quintos, Tema 395 (re 638.115/ce)

Processual Civil Direito Administrativo Ação Rescisória Súmula 343/stf Incorporação De Quintos Tema 395 (re 638.115/ce)

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Parties

União

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Interno No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Juízo De Retratação / Reexame Do Recurso Especial

Legal Issues

1 Incidência da Súmula 343/STF na ação rescisória
2 Violação a literal dispositivo de lei
3 Incorporação de quintos pelo exercício de função comissionada

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.