AREsp 3010036 - DECISAO

Não conhecer do recurso, porque o recorrente deixou de indicar precisamente os dispositivos legais federais supostamente violados ou objeto de dissídio interpretativo, aplicando-se a Súmula 284/STF e a jurisprudência do STJ.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: WELLINGTON LEME DA ROCHA SOUZA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 26 August 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo / Inadmissão De Recurso Especial
Outcome: Não conheço do recurso.
Legal Topics: Admissibilidade De Recurso Especial, Súmula 284/stf, Dissídio Jurisprudencial, Fundamentação Do Recurso

Processo Civil Direito Constitucional Admissibilidade De Recurso Especial Súmula 284/stf Dissídio Jurisprudencial Fundamentação Do Recurso

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 1

Parties

WELLINGTON LEME DA ROCHA SOUZA

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo / Inadmissão De Recurso Especial

Legal Issues

1 Ausência de indicação de dispositivos de lei federal
2 Aplicação da Súmula 284/STF
3 Inadmissibilidade de Recurso Especial por deficiência de fundamentação

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Não conheço do recurso.

Orders

Publique-se.
Intimem-se.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.