REsp 1959355 - ACORDAO

O agravo regimental foi desprovido porque o recorrente não impugnou detidamente os fundamentos centrais do acórdão recorrido (notadamente a premissa sobre a competência do TJ/RS), atraindo assim a incidência das Súmulas 283 e 284/STF; ademais, não é admissível pleitear habeas corpus de ofício para contornar...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: ARY JOSÉ VANAZZI
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 13 December 2021
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental No Recurso Especial / Julgamento Colegiado (quinta Turma)
Outcome: Agravo regimental desprovido; negar provimento ao agravo regimental.
Legal Topics: Art. 92 Da Lei 8.666/1993, Súmulas 283 E 284/stf, Habeas Corpus De Ofício, Competência Jurisdicional, Admissibilidade Do Recurso Especial

Penal Processual Penal Art. 92 Da Lei 8.666/1993 Súmulas 283 E 284/stf Habeas Corpus De Ofício Competência Jurisdicional Admissibilidade Do Recurso Especial

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2

Parties

ARY JOSÉ VANAZZI

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental No Recurso Especial / Julgamento Colegiado (quinta Turma)

Legal Issues

1 falta de impugnação aos fundamentos do acórdão recorrido
2 incidência das Súmulas 283 e 284/STF
3 possibilidade de concessão de habeas corpus de ofício para superar óbice de admissibilidade

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental desprovido; negar provimento ao agravo regimental.

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.