REsp 1923859 - DECISAO

Rejeitaram-se os embargos porque não houve omissão no decisum: a liminar permanece eficaz até expressa revogação ou decisão de cognição exauriente, e com a devolução do feito caberá ao juízo de origem reexaminar eventual necessidade de revisão.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Embargante: M H R
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 25 October 2021
Procedural Posture: Embargos De Declaração / Decisão
Outcome: Rejeitam-se os embargos de declaração.
Legal Topics: Embargos De Declaração, Tutela Provisória, Liminar, Omissão

Processo Civil Embargos De Declaração Tutela Provisória Liminar Omissão

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2

Parties

M H R

Embargante

Procedural Posture

Embargos De Declaração / Decisão

Legal Issues

1 Omissão no decisum quanto à manutenção da liminar deferida na origem

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Rejeitam-se os embargos de declaração.

Orders

Rejeitam-se os embargos de declaração.
Publique-se.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.