AREsp 2679494 - DECISAO

Os embargos foram opostos fora do prazo de 2 dias corridos previsto nos arts. 619 e 798 do CPP, sendo, portanto, intempestivos e inadmissíveis; não conheço dos embargos de declaração.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Embargante: WELLINGTON ROOSEVELT WANDERLEY DE MIRANDA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 30 August 2024
Procedural Posture: Embargos De Declaração / Decisão Sobre Embargos De Declaração
Outcome: Não conheço dos embargos de declaração.
Legal Topics: Embargos De Declaração, Prazo, Intempestividade, Intimação

Processo Penal Embargos De Declaração Prazo Intempestividade Intimação

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

WELLINGTON ROOSEVELT WANDERLEY DE MIRANDA

Embargante

Procedural Posture

Embargos De Declaração / Decisão Sobre Embargos De Declaração

Legal Issues

1 Tempestividade dos embargos de declaração
2 Aplicação dos arts. 619 e 798 do CPP

Ratio Decidendi

Os embargos foram opostos fora do prazo de 2 dias corridos previsto nos arts. 619 e 798 do CPP, sendo, portanto, intempestivos e inadmissíveis; não conheço dos embargos de declaração.

Court Disposition

Não conheço dos embargos de declaração.

Orders

Publique-se.
Intimem-se.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.