AREsp 2865458 - ACORDAO

A dosimetria foi considerada adequada porque o vultoso prejuízo causado à União (R$425.120,14) justificou o aumento da pena-base, não havendo desproporcionalidade; as Cortes Superiores não revisam os critérios discricionários de fixação da pena salvo manifesta ilegalidade ou arbitrariedade.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: PEDRO ALVES DA SILVA FILHO
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 20 May 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Julgamento Colegiado Decisão De Negar Provimento Ao Agravo Regimental
Outcome: Agravo regimental desprovido
Legal Topics: Estelionato Previdenciário, Dosimetria Da Pena, Pena Base, Proporcionalidade

Direito Penal Estelionato Previdenciário Dosimetria Da Pena Pena Base Proporcionalidade

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

PEDRO ALVES DA SILVA FILHO

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Julgamento Colegiado Decisão De Negar Provimento Ao Agravo Regimental

Legal Issues

1 Proporcionalidade da pena imposta
2 Valoração das consequências do delito na fixação da pena-base
3 Revisão da dosimetria por Cortes Superiores

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental desprovido

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.