HC 953589 - ACORDAO

O exame criminológico para fins de progressão de regime é admissível quando houver fundamentação concreta relacionada à periculosidade do apenado; no caso, o Tribunal de origem apresentou fundamentação concreta (presença de transtorno parafílico e parecer anterior desfavorável), inexistindo constrangimento ilegal,...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: OSMAR DA FONSECA SANTOS
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 23 December 2024
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental / Decidido Pela Quinta Turma
Outcome: Recurso desprovido
Legal Topics: Exame Criminológico, Progressão De Regime, Habeas Corpus

Direito Processual Penal Exame Criminológico Progressão De Regime Habeas Corpus

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2

Parties

OSMAR DA FONSECA SANTOS

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental / Decidido Pela Quinta Turma

Legal Issues

1 Se a exigência de exame criminológico para progressão de regime, baseada em fundamentação concreta sobre a periculosidade do apenado, configura constrangimento ilegal

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Recurso desprovido

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental
Manter a decisão que condicionou a progressão de regime à realização de exame criminológico

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.