AREsp 2840930 - DECISAO

DECISÃO Trata-se de agravo interposto por MARIA HELENE DA SILVA AMARAL, MARIA CLAUDETE HOFFMANN da decisão do TRIBUNAL REGIONAL FEDERAL DA 4ª REGIÃO que inadmitiu recurso especial dirigido contra o acórdão prolatado no Agravo de Instrumento n. 5003598-68.2013.4.04.0000. Veja-se a ementa (fl. 421): JUÍZO DE...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: MARIA HELENE DA SILVA AMARAL; Agravante: MARIA CLAUDETE HOFFMANN
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 19 March 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Decisão De Não Conhecimento
Legal Topics: Inadmissão De Recurso Especial, Súmula 83/stj, Súmula 182/stj, Dialeticidade Recursal, Art. 932, III, CPC

Processual Civil Administrativo Inadmissão De Recurso Especial Súmula 83/stj Súmula 182/stj Dialeticidade Recursal Art. 932, Iii, CPC

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Parties

MARIA HELENE DA SILVA AMARAL

Agravante

MARIA CLAUDETE HOFFMANN

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Decisão De Não Conhecimento

Legal Issues

1 Se o agravo em recurso especial poderia ser conhecido diante da ausência de impugnação específica de todos os fundamentos da decisão agravada
2 Aplicação das Súmulas 83 e 182 do STJ e do art. 932, III, do CPC

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.