AREsp 2518197 - ACORDAO

O recurso especial versava sobre ausência de provas para a condenação, matéria que demanda revolvimento do conjunto fático-probatório, sendo, portanto, obstada pela Súmula n. 7 do STJ; diante disso, não há elementos para infirmar a decisão agravada, impondo-se a negativa de provimento ao agravo regimental.

Source-derived case information.

Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 23 April 2024
Procedural Posture: Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Agravo Regimental Contra Decisão Monocrática
Outcome: Negar provimento ao agravo regimental.
Legal Topics: Lesão Corporal, Prova, Súmula N. 7 Do STJ

Direito Penal Lesão Corporal Prova Súmula N. 7 Do STJ

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Procedural Posture

Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Agravo Regimental Contra Decisão Monocrática

Legal Issues

1 Ausência de provas para a condenação
2 Incidência da Súmula n. 7 do STJ e vedação ao revolvimento de fatos e provas em recurso especial

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental.

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.