HC 1081624 - DECISAO

O habeas corpus tornou-se prejudicado em razão da concessão da liberdade provisória pelo juízo de primeiro grau em 15/4/2026 (Processo n. 1500512-59.2025.8.26.0574), com expedição de alvará de soltura.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Beneficiary: G D S M
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 19 May 2026
Procedural Posture: Habeas Corpus / Prejudicado (perda De Objeto)
Outcome: Writ prejudicado
Legal Topics: Lesão Corporal, Violência Doméstica, Prisão Preventiva, Liberdade Provisória, Perda De Objeto

Direito Penal Direito Processual Penal Lesão Corporal Violência Doméstica Prisão Preventiva Liberdade Provisória Perda De Objeto

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1

Parties

G D S M

Beneficiary

Procedural Posture

Habeas Corpus / Prejudicado (perda De Objeto)

Legal Issues

1 Revogação da prisão preventiva
2 Concessão superveniente de liberdade provisória
3 Perda de objeto do habeas corpus

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Writ prejudicado

Orders

Julgo prejudicado o writ.
Publique-se.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.