AREsp 3057332 - ACORDAO

O agravo regimental foi desprovido porque o recorrente deixou de indicar precisamente os dispositivos da legislação federal alegadamente violados, incidindo a Súmula n. 284/STF, o que inviabiliza o conhecimento do recurso especial.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: ANDRÉ LUIS FERREIRA PÁDUA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 27 November 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Agravo Regimental Julgamento Colegiado Pela Sexta Turma
Outcome: Negar provimento ao agravo regimental
Legal Topics: Lesão Corporal Contra Mulher, Violência Doméstica, Súmula 284/stf, Indicação De Dispositivos De Lei Federal

Processo Penal Recurso Especial Direito Processual Lesão Corporal Contra Mulher Violência Doméstica Súmula 284/stf Indicação De Dispositivos De Lei Federal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 1

Parties

ANDRÉ LUIS FERREIRA PÁDUA

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Agravo Regimental Julgamento Colegiado Pela Sexta Turma

Legal Issues

1 Ausência de indicação precisa dos dispositivos da legislação federal que teriam sido violados
2 Aplicabilidade da Súmula n. 284/STF
3 Requisitos de admissibilidade do recurso especial

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.