HC 665837 - ACORDAO

Mantém-se a decisão que indeferiu liminarmente o habeas corpus porque o decreto prisional apresentou fundamentação concreta, notadamente a apreensão de mais de 2 kg de crack, o que evidencia gravidade e risco à ordem pública que justificam a prisão preventiva; por isso, o agravo regimental foi improvido.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Paciente: Maria Anália Moreira
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 14 June 2021
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental No Habeas Corpus / Decisão Colegiada Agravo Regimental (sexta Turma)
Outcome: Agravo regimental improvido; decisão que indeferiu liminarmente o habeas corpus mantida.
Legal Topics: Prisão Preventiva, Tráfico De Drogas, Fundamentação Concreta, Quantidade De Drogas

Penal Processual Penal Prisão Preventiva Tráfico De Drogas Fundamentação Concreta Quantidade De Drogas

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

Maria Anália Moreira

Paciente

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental No Habeas Corpus / Decisão Colegiada Agravo Regimental (sexta Turma)

Legal Issues

1 Legalidade da prisão preventiva
2 Relevância da quantidade de droga para justificar custódia cautelar
3 Possibilidade de exame in limine pelo relator

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental improvido; decisão que indeferiu liminarmente o habeas corpus mantida.

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental
Indeferir liminarmente o habeas corpus

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.