HC 701011 - ACORDAO

Negou-se provimento ao agravo regimental por não estar demonstrada flagrante ilegalidade capaz de afastar a aplicação da Súmula 691/STF, estando a prisão preventiva fundamentada de forma idônea na gravidade concreta dos fatos, no modus operandi e na periculosidade social do paciente.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Paciente: ERICK DOUGLAS MENDES DA SILVA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 03 November 2021
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental Em Habeas Corpus / Agravo Regimental
Outcome: Negado provimento ao agravo regimental.
Legal Topics: Prisão Preventiva, Súmula 691/stf, Habeas Corpus, Gravidade Concreta, Medidas Cautelares

Processo Penal Direito Penal Prisão Preventiva Súmula 691/stf Habeas Corpus Gravidade Concreta Medidas Cautelares

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2

Parties

ERICK DOUGLAS MENDES DA SILVA

Paciente

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental Em Habeas Corpus / Agravo Regimental

Legal Issues

1 Cabimento de habeas corpus contra indeferimento de liminar (Súmula 691/STF)
2 Idoneidade da fundamentação da prisão preventiva baseada em gravidade concreta e modus operandi
3 Possibilidade de substituição da prisão preventiva por medidas cautelares diversas

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Negado provimento ao agravo regimental.

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.