RHC 216237 - ACORDAO

Mantém-se a prisão preventiva porque há fundamentação concreta baseada na gravidade concreta do delito (apreensão de cerca de 615g de maconha e 12g de cocaína), indícios de atuação associada e reiterada no tráfico e risco de reiteração delitiva, sendo insuficientes as medidas cautelares diversas da prisão no caso...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: LUAN MARTINS BEZERRA DOS SANTOS
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 18 August 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental / Sessão Virtual De Julgamento Decisão Colegiada (quinta Turma, 07/08/2025 a 13/08/2025)
Outcome: Agravo regimental improvido
Legal Topics: Prisão Preventiva, Tráfico De Drogas, Habeas Corpus

Direito Processual Penal Prisão Preventiva Tráfico De Drogas Habeas Corpus

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

LUAN MARTINS BEZERRA DOS SANTOS

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental / Sessão Virtual De Julgamento Decisão Colegiada (quinta Turma, 07/08/2025 a 13/08/2025)

Legal Issues

1 Se a prisão preventiva do agravante está devidamente fundamentada na garantia da ordem pública diante da apreensão de significativa quantidade de drogas e indícios de associação para o tráfico.

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental improvido

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.