HC 1002344 - ACORDAO

Havendo identidade de partes e de causa de pedir e inexistindo fundamentos novos em relação ao habeas corpus anteriormente julgado (HC n. 952.201/PE), a nova impetração foi considerada mera reiteração e, com base no art. 210 do RISTJ e em precedentes do STJ, o agravo regimental foi improvido.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: SILDEVÂNIO DOS SANTOS
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 27 August 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental / Julgamento Colegiado (quinta Turma)
Outcome: Agravo regimental improvido.
Legal Topics: Reiteração De Pedido Em Habeas Corpus, Indeferimento Liminar (art. 210 Ristj), Duplicidade Processual

Direito Processual Penal Direito Penal Reiteração De Pedido Em Habeas Corpus Indeferimento Liminar (art. 210 Ristj) Duplicidade Processual

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2

Parties

SILDEVÂNIO DOS SANTOS

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental / Julgamento Colegiado (quinta Turma)

Legal Issues

1 Se a reiteração de pedido em habeas corpus anteriormente impetrado torna inviável o conhecimento da nova impetração
2 Identidade de partes e da causa de pedir como óbice ao conhecimento do novo writ

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental improvido.

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.