AREsp 2810625 - ACORDAO

A Turma manteve a decisão monocrática porque, no caso concreto, a tentativa de subtrair fios de cobre essenciais ao funcionamento de hospital público, agravada pela apresentação de identidade falsa, demonstra elevada ofensividade e reprovabilidade social, além de incidir a vedação estabelecida pela Súmula 599 do STJ...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: LUCAS FERNANDO ALVES PEREIRA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 17 June 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental / Decisão Colegiada Agravo Improvido
Outcome: Agravo regimental improvido; negar provimento ao agravo regimental.
Legal Topics: Tentativa De Furto, Princípio Da Insignificância, Peculato Furto

Direito Penal Tentativa De Furto Princípio Da Insignificância Peculato Furto

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2

Parties

LUCAS FERNANDO ALVES PEREIRA

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental / Decisão Colegiada Agravo Improvido

Legal Issues

1 Aplicabilidade do princípio da insignificância à tentativa de furto de fios de cobre em hospital público infantil com apresentação de identidade falsa
2 Aplicabilidade da Súmula 599 do STJ aos crimes contra a administração pública

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental improvido; negar provimento ao agravo regimental.

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental.
Manter a condenação do agravante por tentativa de furto.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.