AREsp 2406041 - ACORDAO

O agravo interno foi improvido porque a recorrente limitou-se a alegar genericamente afronta aos arts. 489 e 1.022 do CPC sem explicitar os pontos omissos, contraditórios ou obscuros do acórdão recorrido, insuficiência que atrai o óbice da Súmula n. 284/STF, motivo pelo qual se manteve a decisão agravada.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: TEREZINHA APARECIDA DE OLIVEIRA; Agravantes: OUTROS
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 30 October 2024
Procedural Posture: Agravo Interno No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Julgamento Em Sessão Virtual De 22/10/2024 a 28/10/2024
Outcome: Agravo interno improvido
Legal Topics: Violação Dos Arts. 489 E 1.022 Do CPC, Súmula N. 284/stf, Inadmissibilidade Híbrida, Prequestionamento

Processual Civil Violação Dos Arts. 489 E 1.022 Do CPC Súmula N. 284/stf Inadmissibilidade Híbrida Prequestionamento

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2

Parties

TEREZINHA APARECIDA DE OLIVEIRA

Agravante

OUTROS

Agravantes

Procedural Posture

Agravo Interno No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Julgamento Em Sessão Virtual De 22/10/2024 a 28/10/2024

Legal Issues

1 Violação dos arts. 489 e 1.022 do CPC
2 Aplicabilidade da Súmula n. 284/STF por analogia
3 Alcance da decisão de inadmissibilidade de caráter híbrido

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo interno improvido

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo interno.
Manter a decisão agravada.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.