REsp 2222330 - DECISAO

DECISÃO Trata-se de recurso especial, interposto por JOSE MARCOS PARANHOS DA SILVA, com amparo nas alíneas "a" e "c" do permissivo constitucional, no intuito de reformar o acórdão proferido pelo Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Alagoas assim ementado (fls. 243, e-STJ): APELAÇÃO CÍVEL. DIREITO CIVIL. AÇÃO ANULATÓRIA...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Recorrente: JOSE MARCOS PARANHOS DA SILVA; Recorrido: Bruno Frazão de Omena; Recorrido: Waldir Cândido de Omena
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 02 September 2025
Procedural Posture: Recurso Especial / Julgamento No Superior Tribunal De Justiça
Legal Topics: Ação Pauliana, Fraude Contra Credores, Embargos De Declaração, Intempestividade Recursal, Honorários Advocatícios, Súmula 7/stj

Direito Civil Processual Civil Ação Pauliana Fraude Contra Credores Embargos De Declaração Intempestividade Recursal Honorários Advocatícios Súmula 7/stj

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Parties

JOSE MARCOS PARANHOS DA SILVA

Recorrente

Bruno Frazão de Omena

Recorrido

Waldir Cândido de Omena

Recorrido

Procedural Posture

Recurso Especial / Julgamento No Superior Tribunal De Justiça

Legal Issues

1 alegada negativa de prestação jurisdicional/omissão no acórdão
2 efeito interruptivo dos embargos de declaração sobre prazo recursal
3 presença dos requisitos da ação pauliana (anterioridade do crédito, eventus damni, insolvência, scientia fraudis)

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.