AREsp 2140595 - ACORDAO

ACÓRDÃO Vistos e relatados estes autos em que são partes as acima indicadas, acordam os Ministros da QUARTA TURMA do Superior Tribunal de Justiça, em Sessão Virtual de 26/08/2025 a 01/09/2025, por unanimidade, negar provimento ao recurso, nos termos do voto do Sr. Ministro Relator. Os Srs. Ministros Marco Buzzi,...

Source-derived case information.

Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 05 September 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Interno No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Decisão Colegiada (acórdão Proferido Pela Quarta Turma)
Outcome: Agravo interno desprovido (negado provimento).
Legal Topics: Admissibilidade De Recurso Especial, Reexame Do Conjunto Fático Probatório, Súmula 7/stj, Súmula 283/stf, Súmula 284/stf, Súmula 83/stj, Exibição De Documentos, Aplicação Do Código De Defesa Do Consumidor, Capitalização De Juros, Honorários Advocatícios, Descaracterização Da Mora

Direito Civil Processo Civil Admissibilidade De Recurso Especial Reexame Do Conjunto Fático Probatório Súmula 7/stj Súmula 283/stf Súmula 284/stf Súmula 83/stj +5 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 1

Procedural Posture

Agravo Interno No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Decisão Colegiada (acórdão Proferido Pela Quarta Turma)

Court Disposition

Agravo interno desprovido (negado provimento).

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo interno.
Publique-se e intime-se(s).

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.