AREsp 2578624 - ACORDAO

Negou-se provimento ao agravo regimental porque o agravante não impugnou de forma específica e idônea todos os fundamentos da decisão que inadmitiu o recurso especial com base na Súmula 83/STJ, incidindo, por analogia, a Súmula 182/STJ sobre o agravo interno.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: ELDER GOMES DOS SANTOS
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 16 August 2024
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental / Acórdão
Outcome: negado provimento ao agravo regimental
Legal Topics: Admissibilidade De Recursos, Agravo Em Recurso Especial, Súmula 83/stj, Súmula 182/stj, Princípio Da Dialeticidade

Direito Processual Civil Admissibilidade De Recursos Agravo Em Recurso Especial Súmula 83/stj Súmula 182/stj Princípio Da Dialeticidade

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2

Parties

ELDER GOMES DOS SANTOS

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental / Acórdão

Legal Issues

1 se o agravo em recurso especial impugnou adequadamente a aplicação da Súmula 83/STJ
2 incidência da Súmula 182/STJ por ausência de impugnação específica dos fundamentos da decisão de inadmissibilidade

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

negado provimento ao agravo regimental

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.