AREsp 1969405 - DECISAO

DECISÃO Homologo a desistência do agravo em recurso especial (fl. 569) interposto nos presentes autos por LUIZA MARIA DE ALMEIDA DE LIMA. Publique-se. Intimem-se.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: LUIZA MARIA DE ALMEIDA DE LIMA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 06 October 2021
Procedural Posture: Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Homologação Da Desistência
Outcome: Homologo a desistência do agravo em recurso especial interposto por LUIZA MARIA DE ALMEIDA DE LIMA.
Legal Topics: Agravo Em Recurso Especial, Desistência

Processo Civil Agravo Em Recurso Especial Desistência

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Parties

LUIZA MARIA DE ALMEIDA DE LIMA

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Homologação Da Desistência

Legal Issues

1 homologação da desistência do agravo em recurso especial

Court Disposition

Homologo a desistência do agravo em recurso especial interposto por LUIZA MARIA DE ALMEIDA DE LIMA.

Orders

Publique-se.
Intimem-se.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.