RHC 134781 - DECISAO

Considerando a expedição de alvará de soltura em 26/1/2021 em favor do recorrente, verificou-se a perda de objeto do recurso ordinário em habeas corpus, razão pela qual o recurso foi julgado prejudicado.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Recorrente: ANTÔNIO MARCOS CARDOSO BISPO DOS SANTOS
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 25 November 2021
Procedural Posture: Recurso Ordinário Em Habeas Corpus / Decisão De Prejudicialidade
Outcome: Julgo prejudicado o recurso ordinário em habeas corpus.
Legal Topics: Coação Ilegal, Perda De Objeto, Alvará De Soltura

Habeas Corpus Coação Ilegal Perda De Objeto Alvará De Soltura

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

ANTÔNIO MARCOS CARDOSO BISPO DOS SANTOS

Recorrente

Procedural Posture

Recurso Ordinário Em Habeas Corpus / Decisão De Prejudicialidade

Legal Issues

1 alegação de coação ilegal
2 perda de objeto do recurso ordinário por expedição de alvará de soltura

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Julgo prejudicado o recurso ordinário em habeas corpus.

Orders

Publique-se
Intimem-se

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.