AREsp 2468089 - ACORDAO

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental porque a decisão recorrido seguiu a jurisprudência do STJ de que a confissão parcial admite modular a fração da atenuante em parcela inferior a 1/6, e por estar em conformidade com essa orientação o recurso especial não tem trânsito, conforme Súmula nº 83.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: ROMARIO DOS SANTOS PINHEIRO
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 13 May 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental / Julgamento Pela Turma
Outcome: Agravo regimental desprovido
Legal Topics: Confissão Parcial, Atenuante, Fração De Atenuação Inferior a 1/6, Súmula Nº 83

Direito Penal Confissão Parcial Atenuante Fração De Atenuação Inferior a 1/6 Súmula Nº 83

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 1

Parties

ROMARIO DOS SANTOS PINHEIRO

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental / Julgamento Pela Turma

Legal Issues

1 Se a confissão parcial justifica a aplicação de fração de atenuação inferior a 1/6 da pena

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental desprovido

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.