AREsp 2736878 - DECISAO

DECISÃO Examina-se agravo em recurso especial interposto por DANIELA DE MELLO SILVA, contra decisão que inadmitiu recurso especial fundamentado nas alíneas "a" e "c" do permissivo constitucional, contra acórdão do TJ/ES. Agravo em Recurso especial interposto em: 5/12/2025. Concluso ao gabinete em: 7/11/2024. Ação:...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Recorrente: DANIELA DE MELLO SILVA; Impetrante: METRON ENGENHARIA LTDA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 05 August 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Decisão De Admissibilidade/decidido
Legal Topics: Controle De Competência Do Juizado Especial Cível, Negativa De Prestação Jurisdicional, Reexame De Fatos E Provas, Súmula 7/stj, Dissídio Jurisprudencial, Prova Pericial Complexa

Direito Processual Civil Mandado De Segurança Controle De Competência Do Juizado Especial Cível Negativa De Prestação Jurisdicional Reexame De Fatos E Provas Súmula 7/stj Dissídio Jurisprudencial Prova Pericial Complexa

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Parties

DANIELA DE MELLO SILVA

Recorrente

METRON ENGENHARIA LTDA

Impetrante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Decisão De Admissibilidade/decidido

Legal Issues

1 ofensa aos arts. 489 e 1.022 do CPC (negativa de prestação jurisdicional)
2 reexame de fatos e provas em recurso especial (Súmula 7/STJ)
3 comprovação do dissídio jurisprudencial para conhecimento pela alínea 'c' do art. 105, III, da CF

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.