REsp 1873895 - DECISAO

A instância decidiu reconsiderar a decisão de fls. 1.066/1.070 com nova análise do recurso especial de fls. 964/982, tornando prejudicado o julgamento do agravo interno (fls. 1.080/1.101) e determinando a reabertura do prazo recursal.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: CARLOS ALBERTO ROLLO
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 30 June 2021
Procedural Posture: Agravo Interno / Agravo Prejudicado
Outcome: agravo interno prejudicado
Legal Topics: Correção Monetária, Contribuições Previdenciárias, Migração Entre Planos Previdenciários, Resgate De Reservas Previdenciárias, Súmula 289/stj, Resp Repetitivo

Direito Previdenciário Processo Civil Correção Monetária Contribuições Previdenciárias Migração Entre Planos Previdenciários Resgate De Reservas Previdenciárias Súmula 289/stj Resp Repetitivo

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2

Parties

CARLOS ALBERTO ROLLO

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Interno / Agravo Prejudicado

Legal Issues

1 Aplicabilidade do REsp Repetitivo nº 1.551.488 ao caso de migração entre planos seguida de resgate
2 Índice aplicável à atualização monetária (IPC versus índice de poupança) em períodos anteriores e posteriores à migração entre planos previdenciários
3 Aplicação da Súmula nº 289/STJ em caso de resgate da reserva de poupança

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

agravo interno prejudicado

Orders

Decisão reconsiderada com nova análise do recurso especial (fls. 964/982 e 1.066/1.070).
Julgamento do agravo interno prejudicado.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.