EAREsp 2660908 - DECISAO

DECISÃO Trata-se de agravo (e-STJ, fls. 9274-9292) contra decisão de fls. 9259-9267, que inadmitiu o recurso especial (e-STJ, fls. 9139-9156) interposto por PETERSON PEREIRA BERGAMINI MONTEIRO. O recurso especial, fundado na alínea "a" do permissivo constitucional, visa reformar o acórdão proferido pelo TRIBUNAL DE...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Recorrente: PETERSON PEREIRA BERGAMINI MONTEIRO
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 25 November 2024
Procedural Posture: Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Julgamento No Superior Tribunal De Justiça
Legal Topics: Dosimetria Da Pena, Tráfico De Drogas, Associação Para O Tráfico, Circunstâncias Judiciais (art. 42 Da Lei 11.343/06), Majorante Do Art. 40, IV E V Da Lei 11.343/06, Princípio Da Correlação, Inadmissão De Recurso Especial

Direito Penal Processo Penal Dosimetria Da Pena Tráfico De Drogas Associação Para O Tráfico Circunstâncias Judiciais (art. 42 Da Lei 11.343/06) Majorante Do Art. 40, IV E V Da Lei 11.343/06 Princípio Da Correlação +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Parties

PETERSON PEREIRA BERGAMINI MONTEIRO

Recorrente

Procedural Posture

Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Julgamento No Superior Tribunal De Justiça

Legal Issues

1 valoração da natureza e quantidade da droga (art. 42 da Lei 11.343/06)
2 fundamentação da culpabilidade (art. 59 do Código Penal)
3 aplicação da majorante do art. 40, IV e V da Lei 11.343/06

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.