REsp 1934472 - DECISAO

Os embargos foram rejeitados porque não se verificou omissão no decisum: o Tribunal de origem não analisou, mesmo de forma implícita, o dispositivo invocado, caracterizando ausência de prequestionamento, e os embargos de declaração não podem ser utilizados para rediscutir matéria já decidida.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Embargante: NILTON AUGUSTO PASSOS
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 27 May 2021
Procedural Posture: Embargos De Declaração / Decisão Rejeitando Os Embargos
Outcome: Embargos de Declaração rejeitados
Legal Topics: Embargos De Declaração, Prequestionamento, Recurso Especial, Fundamentação Judicial

Processo Civil Direito Tributário Embargos De Declaração Prequestionamento Recurso Especial Fundamentação Judicial

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2

Parties

NILTON AUGUSTO PASSOS

Embargante

Procedural Posture

Embargos De Declaração / Decisão Rejeitando Os Embargos

Legal Issues

1 omissão no acórdão
2 prequestionamento implícito
3 cabimento dos embargos de declaração

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Embargos de Declaração rejeitados

Orders

Rejeito os Embargos Declaratórios.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.