AREsp 2870058 - ACORDAO

ACÓRDÃO Vistos e relatados estes autos em que são partes as acima indicadas, acordam os Ministros da Turma, por unanimidade, rejeitar os embargos. Os Srs. Ministros Ribeiro Dantas, Joel Ilan Paciornik, Messod Azulay Neto e Carlos Cini Marchionatti (Desembargador Convocado TJRS) votaram com o Sr. Ministro...

Source-derived case information.

Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 21 August 2025
Procedural Posture: Embargos De Declaração No Agravo Regimental No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Julgamento Dos Embargos De Declaração (decisão De Rejeição)
Legal Topics: Embargos De Declaração, Súmula 182/stj, Inadmissão De Agravo Regimental, Prequestionamento, Dosimetria Da Pena, Súmula 83/stj, Súmula 211/stf, Súmula 282/stf

Processo Penal Direito Penal Embargos De Declaração Súmula 182/stj Inadmissão De Agravo Regimental Prequestionamento Dosimetria Da Pena Súmula 83/stj +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Procedural Posture

Embargos De Declaração No Agravo Regimental No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Julgamento Dos Embargos De Declaração (decisão De Rejeição)

Legal Issues

1 existência de omissão, contradição ou obscuridade no acórdão
2 aplicabilidade da Súmula 182/STJ ao agravo regimental
3 possibilidade de prequestionamento de matéria constitucional no STJ

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.