AREsp 2930359 - ACORDAO

Os embargos de declaração foram rejeitados porque o acórdão embargado expôs claramente as razões para negar provimento ao agravo regimental, fundamentando-se na Súmula 182/STJ, e as alegações do embargante configuram mero inconformismo ou tentativa de revisão da decisão, não sendo cabíveis nos aclaratórios; além...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Embargante: MARINO DAMIAN DE PIERI
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 09 September 2025
Procedural Posture: Embargos De Declaração / Julgamento De Embargos De Declaração (acórdão De Rejeição)
Outcome: Embargos de declaração rejeitados
Legal Topics: Embargos De Declaração, Súmula 182/stj, Súmula 83/stj, CPP, Art. 619, Rejeição De Embargos

Direito Processual Penal Embargos De Declaração Súmula 182/stj Súmula 83/stj Cpp, Art. 619 Rejeição De Embargos

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2

Parties

MARINO DAMIAN DE PIERI

Embargante

Procedural Posture

Embargos De Declaração / Julgamento De Embargos De Declaração (acórdão De Rejeição)

Legal Issues

1 verificar se há vício integrativo no acórdão embargado
2 se a parte impugnou adequadamente todos os fundamentos que ensejaram a inadmissão do recurso especial conforme a Súmula 182/STJ

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Embargos de declaração rejeitados

Orders

Embargos de declaração rejeitados
Decisão por unanimidade

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.