HC 696459 - DECISAO

O writ foi declarado prejudicado porque, após a impetração, foi deferido ao sentenciado o livramento condicional em 20/10/2021, o que eliminou a controvérsia sobre a necessidade prévia de exame criminológico.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Paciente: Deslando Farias Brito; Juízo a Quo: Juízo da 1ª Vara das Execuções Criminais e Anexo do Júri da comarca de Araçatuba/SP
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 08 November 2021
Procedural Posture: Habeas Corpus / Prejudicado
Outcome: habeas corpus prejudicado
Legal Topics: Exame Criminológico, Livramento Condicional, Perda De Objeto

Execução Penal Habeas Corpus Exame Criminológico Livramento Condicional Perda De Objeto

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Deslando Farias Brito

Paciente

Juízo da 1ª Vara das Execuções Criminais e Anexo do Júri da comarca de Araçatuba/SP

Juízo a Quo

Procedural Posture

Habeas Corpus / Prejudicado

Legal Issues

1 Determinação de realização de exame criminológico para análise de progressão de regime e de livramento condicional
2 Perda de objeto do writ em razão de concessão de livramento condicional posterior

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

habeas corpus prejudicado

Orders

Habeas corpus prejudicado
Publique-se.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.