HC 977767 - ACORDAO

A exigência generalizada de exame criminológico introduzida pela Lei n. 14.843/2024 configura novatio legis in pejus e não pode ser aplicada retroativamente; contudo, nas hipóteses em que há peculiaridades do caso e decisão motivada (como a gravidade concreta do crime de estupro contra a própria filha), a exigência...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: SAMUEL DA SILVA FERREIRA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 04 June 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental Em Habeas Corpus / Julgamento (sessão Virtual)
Outcome: Agravo regimental improvido
Legal Topics: Exame Criminológico, Progressão De Regime, Novatio Legis in Pejus, Fundamentação Concreta

Execução Penal Habeas Corpus Direito Penal Direito Constitucional Exame Criminológico Progressão De Regime Novatio Legis in Pejus Fundamentação Concreta

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2

Parties

SAMUEL DA SILVA FERREIRA

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental Em Habeas Corpus / Julgamento (sessão Virtual)

Legal Issues

1 Se a exigência de exame criminológico para progressão de regime, prevista na Lei n. 14.843/2024, constitui novatio legis in pejus
2 Se a exigência do exame criminológico é justificada pela gravidade concreta do crime no caso concreto

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental improvido

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.