REsp 2094761 - DECISAO

DECISÃO Trata-se de recurso especial interposto por ANDERSON FIGUEIREDO DE MELLO, com fundamento no artigo 105, inciso III, alínea "a", da Constituição da República, contra acórdão proferido pelo TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO ESTADO DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL. Em suas razões recursais (fls. 424-442), o recorrente sustenta...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Recorrente: ANDERSON FIGUEIREDO DE MELLO
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 08 November 2024
Procedural Posture: Recurso Especial / Decisão
Legal Topics: Furto Qualificado, Dosimetria Da Pena, Reformatio in Pejus, Repouso Noturno, Provas, Maus Antecedentes, Continuidade Delitiva

Direito Penal Processo Penal Furto Qualificado Dosimetria Da Pena Reformatio in Pejus Repouso Noturno Provas Maus Antecedentes +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Parties

ANDERSON FIGUEIREDO DE MELLO

Recorrente

Procedural Posture

Recurso Especial / Decisão

Legal Issues

1 suficiência de provas para condenação nos fatos 1,2,3,4,6 e 7
2 ocorrência de reformatio in pejus na dosimetria em recurso exclusivo da defesa
3 necessidade de redução proporcional da pena-base após neutralização de circunstância judicial negativa

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.