AREsp 2858608 - ACORDAO

Negou-se provimento ao agravo regimental porque a alteração do entendimento exigiria reexame do conjunto fático-probatório (testemunhos, depoimento da vítima e provas materiais) realizado pelo Tribunal de origem, providência vedada em recurso especial pela Súmula 7/STJ; o acórdão de origem concluiu haver provas...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: JOAO GABRIEL COSTA CARDOSO; Vítima: Maria da Cruz Cavalcante Cardoso
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 30 April 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Julgamento Em Turma / Decisão Colegiada
Outcome: Negado provimento ao agravo regimental
Legal Topics: Furto Qualificado Por Abuso De Confiança, Reexame De Prova, Súmula 7/stj

Processo Penal Direito Penal Furto Qualificado Por Abuso De Confiança Reexame De Prova Súmula 7/stj

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6

Parties

JOAO GABRIEL COSTA CARDOSO

Agravante

Maria da Cruz Cavalcante Cardoso

Vítima

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Julgamento Em Turma / Decisão Colegiada

Legal Issues

1 alegada ausência de provas para a condenação
2 imprescindibilidade do revolvimento fático-probatório
3 incidência da Súmula 7/STJ

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Negado provimento ao agravo regimental

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.