AREsp 1998283 - DECISAO

DECISÃO Trata-se de agravo nos próprios autos (CPC/2015, art. 1.042) interposto contra decisão que não admitiu o recurso especial por inexistência de violação de lei federal, incidência da Súmula n. 7 do STJ e falta de demonstração do dissídio jurisprudencial (e-STJ fls. 300/303). O acórdão recorrido está assim...

Source-derived case information.

Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 26 June 2024
Procedural Posture: Agravo Nos Próprios Autos (cpc/2015, Art. 1.042) / Decisão Sobre Agravo Nos Próprios Autos (juízo De Retratação)
Legal Topics: Gratuidade Judiciária, Prequestionamento, Dissídio Jurisprudencial, Súmula 7/stj, Súmula 211/stj, Súmula 284/stf, Reexame De Matéria Fático Probatória

Processo Civil Direito Processual Civil Gratuidade Judiciária Prequestionamento Dissídio Jurisprudencial Súmula 7/stj Súmula 211/stj Súmula 284/stf +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Procedural Posture

Agravo Nos Próprios Autos (cpc/2015, Art. 1.042) / Decisão Sobre Agravo Nos Próprios Autos (juízo De Retratação)

Legal Issues

1 admissibilidade do recurso especial
2 concessão parcial de gratuidade judiciária
3 ausência de prequestionamento

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.