HC 696119 - DECISAO

Por não ter o Tribunal de origem apreciado o mérito do habeas corpus e inexistindo, em juízo sumário, flagrante ilegalidade que autorizasse ultrapassar o enunciado da Súmula 691/STF, o Superior Tribunal de Justiça não conhece do pedido de habeas corpus para fins de concessão de liminar, razão pela qual a liminar foi...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Paciente: IVAN AUGUSTO VALL RIBEIRO; Autoridade Coatora: TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 28 September 2021
Procedural Posture: Habeas Corpus / Pedido De Liminar
Outcome: liminar indeferida
Legal Topics: Habeas Corpus, Liminar, Súmula 691/stf, Júri, Covid 19, Pronúncia

Processo Penal Direito Penal Habeas Corpus Liminar Súmula 691/stf Júri Covid 19 Pronúncia

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2

Parties

IVAN AUGUSTO VALL RIBEIRO

Paciente

TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO

Autoridade Coatora

Procedural Posture

Habeas Corpus / Pedido De Liminar

Legal Issues

1 cabimento de habeas corpus contra indeferimento de liminar em outro writ
2 exceção de flagrante ilegalidade à Súmula 691/STF
3 pedido de adiamento de sessão plenária do Júri

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

liminar indeferida

Orders

Indefiro liminarmente o pedido de habeas corpus.
Cientifique-se o Ministério Público Federal.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.