EAREsp 2655917 - ACORDAO

O agravante não impugnou de forma específica e integral todos os fundamentos que motivaram a inadmissão do recurso especial na origem; aplicando-se a Súmula 182/STJ, o agravo regimental deve ser desprovido.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: CLÊNIO EDUARDO ARRUDA GARCIA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 06 December 2024
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental Em Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Decisão Colegiada (turma)
Outcome: Agravo regimental desprovido.
Legal Topics: Impugnação Específica, Inadmissão Do Recurso Especial, Súmula 182/stj, Súmula 7/stj, Súmula 284/stf

Direito Processual Penal Impugnação Específica Inadmissão Do Recurso Especial Súmula 182/stj Súmula 7/stj Súmula 284/stf

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2

Parties

CLÊNIO EDUARDO ARRUDA GARCIA

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental Em Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Decisão Colegiada (turma)

Legal Issues

1 Saber se a parte agravante impugnou adequadamente todos os fundamentos que ensejaram a inadmissão do recurso especial, conforme exigido pela Súmula 182/STJ

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental desprovido.

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.