AREsp 2808165 - ACORDAO

O agravo regimental foi negado porque o agravante não impugnou de forma específica e suficiente todos os fundamentos da decisão agravada, nem apresentou precedentes contemporâneos para afastar o óbice da Súmula 83/STJ, atraindo a incidência da Súmula 182/STJ.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: JUAN MEDEIROS SOUSA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 26 February 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Julgamento
Outcome: Agravo regimental improvido
Legal Topics: Impugnação Específica, Súmula 182/stj, Súmula 7/stj, Súmula 83/stj, Inadmissibilidade Do Recurso Especial, Dosimetria Da Pena, Detração

Direito Processual Penal Impugnação Específica Súmula 182/stj Súmula 7/stj Súmula 83/stj Inadmissibilidade Do Recurso Especial Dosimetria Da Pena Detração

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2

Parties

JUAN MEDEIROS SOUSA

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Julgamento

Legal Issues

1 Se o agravo regimental atende ao requisito de impugnação específica dos fundamentos da decisão agravada, conforme a Súmula 182/STJ
2 Se o agravante refutou adequadamente os fundamentos que levaram à não admissão do recurso especial, inclusive as Súmulas 7 e 83/STJ

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental improvido

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.