AREsp 2867597 - ACORDAO

Negou-se provimento ao agravo regimental porque o agravante deixou de impugnar de forma específica e fundamentada todos os fundamentos que embasaram a decisão que inadmitiu o recurso especial, incidindo a Súmula 182/STJ; a alegação genérica de revaloração da prova é insuficiente para afastar a Súmula 7/STJ.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: ARTHUR CELSO DE SOUZA; Interveniente: Ministério Público Federal
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 15 August 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental / Julgamento
Outcome: Agravo regimental não provido
Legal Topics: Impugnação Específica, Súmula 182/stj, Inadmissão De Recurso Especial, Súmula 7/stj, Súmula 83/stj

Direito Processual Penal Impugnação Específica Súmula 182/stj Inadmissão De Recurso Especial Súmula 7/stj Súmula 83/stj

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2

Parties

ARTHUR CELSO DE SOUZA

Agravante

Ministério Público Federal

Interveniente

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental / Julgamento

Legal Issues

1 se a parte agravante impugnou adequadamente todos os fundamentos utilizados pela Corte de origem para inadmitir o recurso especial

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental não provido

Orders

Nega provimento ao agravo regimental
Decisão agravada mantida

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.