AREsp 2924411 - ACORDAO

A decisão agravada foi mantida porque a parte agravante não impugnou especificamente todos os fundamentos que ensejaram a inadmissão do recurso especial; por isso incidiu a Súmula 182/STJ, motivo pelo qual se negou provimento ao agravo regimental.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: CLÁUDIO LIMA DA CUNHA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 19 August 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Decisão Colegiada Agravo Regimental Negado Provimento
Outcome: Agravo regimental negado provimento
Legal Topics: Impugnação Específica, Súmula 182/stj, Inadmissão Do Recurso Especial, Súmula 7/stj, Agravo Regimental

Direito Processual PENAL Impugnação Específica Súmula 182/stj Inadmissão Do Recurso Especial Súmula 7/stj Agravo Regimental

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2

Parties

CLÁUDIO LIMA DA CUNHA

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Decisão Colegiada Agravo Regimental Negado Provimento

Legal Issues

1 Se a parte agravante impugnou adequadamente todos os fundamentos que ensejaram a inadmissão do recurso especial, conforme exigido pela Súmula 182/STJ.

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental negado provimento

Orders

Nego provimento ao agravo regimental.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.