AREsp 2578839 - ACORDAO

O agravo regimental foi desprovido porque a agravante não impugnou de forma específica e concreta todos os fundamentos da decisão que inadmitiu o recurso especial na origem (notadamente os óbices das Súmulas n. 7 e n. 83 do STJ e da Súmula n. 284 do STF), razão pela qual incide a Súmula n. 182 do STJ e normas...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: LINDALVA SILVA RABELO MONDEGO
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 13 October 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental / Julgamento
Outcome: Agravo regimental desprovido
Legal Topics: Impugnação Específica, Inadmissibilidade De Recurso Especial, Súmulas 7 E 83 Do STJ, Súmula 284 Do STF, Súmula 182 Do STJ, Habeas Corpus De Ofício

Direito Processual Penal Direito Processual Civil Impugnação Específica Inadmissibilidade De Recurso Especial Súmulas 7 E 83 Do STJ Súmula 284 Do STF Súmula 182 Do STJ Habeas Corpus De Ofício

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2

Parties

LINDALVA SILVA RABELO MONDEGO

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental / Julgamento

Legal Issues

1 Se a defesa impugnou efetivamente os fundamentos da decisão que inadmitiu o recurso especial na origem
2 Se há ilegalidade que autorize a concessão de ordem de habeas corpus de ofício

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental desprovido

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.