AREsp 2494340 - ACORDAO

Negou‑se provimento ao agravo interno porque a parte agravante não demonstrou de forma específica e detalhada a divergência jurisprudencial em relação à decisão recorrida, atraindo a aplicação da Súmula n. 182 do STJ.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: MARIA DE LOURDES FALBO; Agravante: WANDERLEY FALBO
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 29 September 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Interno / Julgamento Acórdão
Outcome: agravo interno desprovido (negado provimento)
Legal Topics: Impugnação Específica Dos Fundamentos, Divergência Jurisprudencial, Requisitos De Admissibilidade Do Recurso Especial, Súmula N. 182 Do STJ

Direito Processual Civil Impugnação Específica Dos Fundamentos Divergência Jurisprudencial Requisitos De Admissibilidade Do Recurso Especial Súmula N. 182 Do STJ

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 1

Parties

MARIA DE LOURDES FALBO

Agravante

WANDERLEY FALBO

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Interno / Julgamento Acórdão

Legal Issues

1 Se a parte agravante impugnou especificamente os fundamentos da decisão recorrida, demonstrando a divergência jurisprudencial de forma concreta e pormenorizada

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

agravo interno desprovido (negado provimento)

Orders

Negado provimento ao agravo interno.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.