HC 872140 - DECISAO

O pedido tornou-se prejudicado em razão de ter sido realizado o exame criminológico e ter sido indeferido o livramento condicional, de modo que o agravo regimental foi julgado prejudicado.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: Rogerio Tavares de Araujo Junior
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 13 June 2024
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental Em Habeas Corpus / Decisão Prejudicada
Outcome: Agravo regimental prejudicado
Legal Topics: Livramento Condicional, Exame Criminológico, Súmula 691/stf, Perda De Objeto

Execução Penal Habeas Corpus Direito Processual Penal Livramento Condicional Exame Criminológico Súmula 691/stf Perda De Objeto

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1

Parties

Rogerio Tavares de Araujo Junior

Agravante

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental Em Habeas Corpus / Decisão Prejudicada

Legal Issues

1 Aplicabilidade da Súmula 691/STF ao habeas corpus
2 Fundamentação para determinação de exame criminológico
3 Perda de objeto do writ em razão de fato superveniente

Ratio Decidendi

O pedido tornou-se prejudicado em razão de ter sido realizado o exame criminológico e ter sido indeferido o livramento condicional, de modo que o agravo regimental foi julgado prejudicado.

Court Disposition

Agravo regimental prejudicado

Orders

Agravo regimental prejudicado
Publique-se

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.