HC 1020017 - DECISAO

Houve perda superveniente do objeto em razão de decisão judicial que revogou as medidas cautelares diversas da prisão e determinou a restituição do passaporte, tornando prejudicado o pedido de habeas corpus.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Paciente: RICHARD JAMES BENJAMINS; Autoridade Coatora: TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO DISTRITO FEDERAL E DOS TERRITÓRIOS
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 22 August 2025
Procedural Posture: Habeas Corpus / Decidido (petição Julgada Prejudicada)
Outcome: petição de habeas corpus julgada prejudicada
Legal Topics: Medidas Cautelares Diversas Da Prisão, Retenção De Passaporte, Perda De Objeto, Excesso De Prazo De Inquérito

Direito Penal Direito Processual Penal Habeas Corpus Medidas Cautelares Diversas Da Prisão Retenção De Passaporte Perda De Objeto Excesso De Prazo De Inquérito

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

RICHARD JAMES BENJAMINS

Paciente

TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO DISTRITO FEDERAL E DOS TERRITÓRIOS

Autoridade Coatora

Procedural Posture

Habeas Corpus / Decidido (petição Julgada Prejudicada)

Legal Issues

1 excesso de prazo na retenção do passaporte
2 revogação de medidas cautelares diversas da prisão
3 prejudicialidade por perda superveniente do objeto

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

petição de habeas corpus julgada prejudicada

Orders

Petição de habeas corpus julgada prejudicada
Publique-se

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.