RHC 186860 - DECISAO

Houve revogação das medidas protetivas de urgência em sentença prolatada em 15/4/2024, o que configurou superveniente ausência de interesse de agir e levou à prejudicialidade do recurso.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Recorrente: EDSON CLEVE DA SILVA ALMEIDA; Recorrido: Tribunal de Justiça do Estado da Bahia
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 12 September 2024
Procedural Posture: Habeas Corpus / Recurso Interposto No Superior Tribunal De Justiça Julgamento Prejudicado
Outcome: Recurso prejudicado.
Legal Topics: Medidas Protetivas De Urgência, Prejudicialidade, Revogação De Medidas Protetivas

Direito Processual Penal Medidas Protetivas De Urgência Prejudicialidade Revogação De Medidas Protetivas

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1

Parties

EDSON CLEVE DA SILVA ALMEIDA

Recorrente

Tribunal de Justiça do Estado da Bahia

Recorrido

Procedural Posture

Habeas Corpus / Recurso Interposto No Superior Tribunal De Justiça Julgamento Prejudicado

Legal Issues

1 revogação das medidas protetivas de urgência
2 superveniente ausência de interesse de agir

Ratio Decidendi

Houve revogação das medidas protetivas de urgência em sentença prolatada em 15/4/2024, o que configurou superveniente ausência de interesse de agir e levou à prejudicialidade do recurso.

Court Disposition

Recurso prejudicado.

Orders

Publique-se.
Intimem-se.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.