AREsp 2962802 - DECISAO

DECISÃO Trata-se de embargos de declaração opostos por JOHN DA ROCHA FRANCA contra decisão que conheceu do agravo para negar provimento ao recurso especial (e-STJ, fls. 489/493). A parte embargante sustenta a existência de omissões no julgado, afirmando que não foram examinados pontos essenciais ao deslinde da...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Embargante: JOHN DA ROCHA FRANCA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 21 August 2025
Procedural Posture: Embargos De Declaração / Julgamento
Legal Topics: Omissão, Legalidade Da Busca Pessoal E Veicular, Fundada Suspeita, Valoração Do Depoimento Policial, Súmula 7/stj

Processo Penal Processo Civil Omissão Legalidade Da Busca Pessoal E Veicular Fundada Suspeita Valoração Do Depoimento Policial Súmula 7/stj

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Parties

JOHN DA ROCHA FRANCA

Embargante

Procedural Posture

Embargos De Declaração / Julgamento

Legal Issues

1 Existência de omissão no julgado
2 Se a narrativa policial isolada seria suficiente para legitimar a busca
3 Se a análise da plausibilidade da narrativa demanda reexame do acervo probatório

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.