AREsp 2629800 - ACORDAO

Negou-se provimento ao agravo regimental porque a impugnação exige revolvimento do material fático-probatório, vedado em recurso especial pela Súmula 7/STJ, e o recorrente também não comprovou dissídio jurisprudencial por ausência de cotejo analítico entre acórdãos.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante/recorrente: AMIRALDO DE SOUZA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 10 June 2025
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Decisão Colegiada (turma)
Outcome: negou provimento ao agravo regimental
Legal Topics: Porte Ilegal De Arma De Fogo, Súmula 7/stj, Dissídio Jurisprudencial, Reexame De Provas

Penal Processo Penal Porte Ilegal De Arma De Fogo Súmula 7/stj Dissídio Jurisprudencial Reexame De Provas

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

AMIRALDO DE SOUZA

Agravante/recorrente

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental No Agravo Em Recurso Especial / Decisão Colegiada (turma)

Legal Issues

1 ausência de prova de autoria delitiva
2 necessidade de revolvimento do material fático-probatório
3 dissídio jurisprudencial não comprovado

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

negou provimento ao agravo regimental

Orders

Negou provimento ao agravo regimental.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.