AREsp 1825537 - DECISAO

DECISÃO Trata-se de recurso extraordinário interposto por ÉRICA ALVES SCHMIDT PRETO, FÁBIO ALVES HADDAD eMARCELLO HENRIQUE PIMENTEL DE CARVALHO PRETO, com fundamento no art. 102, inciso III, alínea "a", da Constituição Federal, contra acórdão deste Superior Tribunal de Justiça, assim ementado (e-STJ fl. 723): AGRAVO...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Recorrente: ÉRICA ALVES SCHMIDT PRETO; Recorrente: FÁBIO ALVES HADDAD; Recorrente: MARCELLO HENRIQUE PIMENTEL DE CARVALHO PRETO
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 21 September 2021
Procedural Posture: Recurso Extraordinário / Seguimento Negado
Legal Topics: Pressupostos De Admissibilidade De Recurso, Repercussão Geral (tema 181/stf), Súmula 182/stj, Princípio Da Dialeticidade

Direito Constitucional Direito Processual Civil Pressupostos De Admissibilidade De Recurso Repercussão Geral (tema 181/stf) Súmula 182/stj Princípio Da Dialeticidade

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Parties

ÉRICA ALVES SCHMIDT PRETO

Recorrente

FÁBIO ALVES HADDAD

Recorrente

MARCELLO HENRIQUE PIMENTEL DE CARVALHO PRETO

Recorrente

Procedural Posture

Recurso Extraordinário / Seguimento Negado

Legal Issues

1 admissibilidade do recurso especial
2 aplicação da Súmula 182/STJ por analogia
3 existência de repercussão geral (Tema 181/STF)

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.

AREsp 1825537 - DECISAO

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Parties

Procedural Posture

Legal Issues

Judgment text and source record

Sign in to read the full judgment text