HC 889162 - ACORDAO

Negado provimento ao agravo regimental porque o valor sonegado (R$ 28.038,94) supera o parâmetro do STJ para insignificância (R$ 20.000,00), a reiteração delitiva (treze crimes parcelares) afasta a aplicação da bagatela, e a Portaria GAB/PGESC n. 58/2021 é norma administrativa que não se equipara a lei penal para...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante/paciente: EDITTE MARIA PEREIRA
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 20 June 2024
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental No Habeas Corpus / Julgamento Colegiado (quinta Turma)
Outcome: negado provimento ao agravo regimental
Legal Topics: Princípio Da Insignificância, Bagatela, Reiteração Delitiva, Retroatividade De Portaria, Portaria Gab/pgesc 58/2021, Habeas Corpus

Processo Penal Direito Penal Direito Tributário Princípio Da Insignificância Bagatela Reiteração Delitiva Retroatividade De Portaria Portaria Gab/pgesc 58/2021 +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5

Parties

EDITTE MARIA PEREIRA

Agravante/paciente

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental No Habeas Corpus / Julgamento Colegiado (quinta Turma)

Legal Issues

1 Aplicação do princípio da insignificância a crimes tributários
2 Inaplicabilidade da bagatela a réus contumazes
3 Retroatividade da Portaria GAB/PGESC n. 58/2021

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

negado provimento ao agravo regimental

Orders

Negar provimento ao agravo regimental
Manter a decisão monocrática que não conheceu do habeas corpus

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.