HC 955546 - ACORDAO

A aplicação do princípio da insignificância é excepcional e, diante da ofensividade e reprovabilidade da conduta (danos relevantes, risco de incêndio e prática reiterada), não se comprovou a ausência de periculosidade social nem o reduzidíssimo grau de reprovabilidade, razão pela qual o agravo regimental foi...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Agravante: JOSE MARIA DE MELO ANSELMO; Agravado: Presidência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Court: Superior Tribunal de Justiça
Jurisdiction: Brazil
Judgment Date: 23 December 2024
Procedural Posture: Agravo Regimental / Julgamento Pela Quinta Turma
Outcome: Agravo desprovido
Legal Topics: Princípio Da Insignificância, Furto, Habeas Corpus

Direito Penal Princípio Da Insignificância Furto Habeas Corpus

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2

Parties

JOSE MARIA DE MELO ANSELMO

Agravante

Presidência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça

Agravado

Procedural Posture

Agravo Regimental / Julgamento Pela Quinta Turma

Legal Issues

1 Aplicação do princípio da insignificância à conduta de furto que envolveu danificação de veículos e risco de incêndio

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Agravo desprovido

Orders

Negado provimento ao agravo regimental.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.